We do not believe that the zoning variance should be granted to this developer for the following reasons:
Arborlea was once a tree nursery and preserving the small areas of open space and trees are part of the neighborhood's appeal.
A house built on a lot deemed too small would only negatively effect the surrounding house values.
This lot is at a stop sign near the crest of a well travelled hill where one is blind to the other side of the incline and where lighting is poor.
It would seem that the grating of a variance should be for an existing homeowner where the current zoning impacts negatively on their ability to utilize their property (and the granting the the variance will not negatively affect existing residents). If a variance can be granted for any developer hoping to turn a profit on an empty lot (in a neighborhood where there are already long term unsold new build houses) then there does not seem much point in having zoning codes in the first place. I am against the variance.