We, the undersigned, do not think that the STAT membership had sufficient time for a properly informed debate or enough time for consultation on the issues of NOS and CNHC. We call upon Council to take no further action on NOS/CNHC compliance until the membership has had sufficient time for debate and consultation (over at least two issues of Statnews) on NOS and CNHC, and new votes on these two issues are arranged for a future AGM or Extraordinary General Meeting.
I really thought this might just fizzle out but seeing so many people agreeing that the debate felt rushed hit me pretty hard today. People keep messaging me about how confused they felt during the last meeting which just proves we actually needed more time to talk this through before jumping into any decisions. It feels like we finally have enough weight behind us now to actually stop and ask for a pause.
6 Comments
J
Julie Ellis
16 years ago
Featured
WE NEED MORE TIME! Stop rushing these votes through when nobody knows whats going on.
S
Sarah Gibson
16 years ago
Featured
This whole thing is being pushed way to fast. We need to actually read the info before voting on something this big. Slow down.
R
Robert Velez
16 years ago
Featured
Agreed. Two issues of Statnews is the bare minimum for transparency. Dont move forward yet.
D
David Robinson
16 years ago
Featured
Ridiculous that we are expected to make a choice without properly reviewing the details. Give us the time we need to debate this properly.
E
Elena Fletcher
16 years ago
Featured
Seriously just hold off on the vote. It feels like they are trying to hide something by keeping us in the dark.
M
Mark Sharma
16 years ago
Featured
not enough time to look over the docs. very shady behavior from council honestly.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Share directly
Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.
We, the undersigned, do not think that the STAT membership had sufficient time for a properly informed debate or enough time for consultation on the issues of NOS and CNHC. We call upon Council to take no further action on NOS/CNHC compliance until the membership has had sufficient time for debate and consultation (over at least two issues of Statnews) on NOS and CNHC, and new votes on these two issues are arranged for a future AGM or Extraordinary General Meeting.
Updates
November 16, 2009
I really thought this might just fizzle out but seeing so many people agreeing that the debate felt rushed hit me pretty hard today. People keep messaging me about how confused they felt during the last meeting which just proves we actually needed more time to talk this through before jumping into any decisions. It feels like we finally have enough weight behind us now to actually stop and ask for a pause.
6 Comments
J
Julie Ellis
16 years ago
Featured
WE NEED MORE TIME! Stop rushing these votes through when nobody knows whats going on.
S
Sarah Gibson
16 years ago
Featured
This whole thing is being pushed way to fast. We need to actually read the info before voting on something this big. Slow down.
R
Robert Velez
16 years ago
Featured
Agreed. Two issues of Statnews is the bare minimum for transparency. Dont move forward yet.
D
David Robinson
16 years ago
Featured
Ridiculous that we are expected to make a choice without properly reviewing the details. Give us the time we need to debate this properly.
E
Elena Fletcher
16 years ago
Featured
Seriously just hold off on the vote. It feels like they are trying to hide something by keeping us in the dark.
M
Mark Sharma
16 years ago
Featured
not enough time to look over the docs. very shady behavior from council honestly.
WE NEED MORE TIME! Stop rushing these votes through when nobody knows whats going on.