House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Open letter to MPs with Constituencies in England and
Wales
RE: Serious public concerns about the management and
governance of the RSPCA in its current form to respond to animal cruelty
We are concerned with the Royal Society for the
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) failure to perform and respond appropriately
to public concerns about injured or mistreated animals. This letter is addressed
to all Members of Parliament for the following reasons
1. RSPCA
failures impact the social infrastructure of every constituency in England and
Wales. Research indicates failure to address mistreatment of animals has a
direct impact on the mental health and wellbeing of human beings.
2. Animal
abusers often become physically abusive towards other individuals. Histories of
violence toward animals can be seen in the profiles of domestic abusers and
other violent offenders,
3. Long
running surveys indicate that 80% of the public have no confidence in the RSPCA
to perform its role satisfactorily. Within this 80% the public have
communicated experiencing feelings of being poorly treated by the RSPCA as an
organisation: these range from disappointment to victimisation by the charity.
(All charities exist to benefit the public.)
4. The
Charity Commission appears to be failing to take definitive action over RSPCA’s
failures despite the commission’s warnings to the RSPCA issued in 2018 and
2019. The situation is deteriorating rather than improving, There are no apparent checks in place to regulate the RSPCA's conduct which gives the impression they are impervious to scrutiny or censure.
To remedy these serious concerns, we request that each MP
backs an initiative to restructure the primary responsibilities to a coalition delivery
model. This model would include implementing the following measures:
1. Primacy
for management of responding to cruelty reporting is removed from the RSPCA. This
should be devolved to accredited national rescues with a presence in constituencies
(including the RSPCA, but not reliant on their judgement or discretion).
2. Accredited
rescues (not solely the RSPCA) are granted powers to work with law enforcement
to apply for warrants to seize distressed or mistreated animals. This checks the RSPCA's monopoly and goes some way to rebuilding public trust and confidence that animal welfare is monitored appropriately and objectively.
3. Animal
Welfare Officers in local authorities should step in to resolve unanswered
calls within a 72 hour period. This include emergency powers to remove animals that show
signs of obvious abuse: wounds, undernourishment, unsanitary environment or
mental distress. This intervention should be mandatory, not optional.
4. At
least two senior veterinary surgeons should be included in a coalition delivery
model to ensure provisions within the Animal Welfare Act are enforced based on
objective veterinary assessment. Business development, PR and marketing people appear to be driving policy at the RSPCA. The remit of cruelty prevention has been obscured by income generation and video production.
The public are very concerned that despite its charitable
status, the RSPCA exerts undue influence and power over social norms regarding
animal welfare. The public should not distrust or fear the RSPCA. However, insight
indicates that this is the current experience and sentiment. We are deeply
concerned that with such substantial income, the RSPCA cannot manage its resources
and address operational challenges.
This failure to perform at the most basic
level is negatively impacting individuals in every constituency and placing
strain on other agencies including the fire brigade and the police. RSPCA
failures are also putting the public in harm’s way as many individuals are rescuing
animals on their own after the RSPCA decline to attend or fail to respond. Cruelty in all forms has reached critical levels.
Please consider the public’s proposed remedial actions
and consider initiating a parliamentary debate on a coalition model to respond to animal cruelty.
Thank you.
The rspca have repeatedly ignored my requests for help in the past, to the extent where I have lost all faith and would never ask for help again. Animals are left in conditions where the basic rights listed within the animal welfare law 2006 are not met. I strongly believe that they are no longer fit for purpose.